Il 17/05/2014 19:52, Martin Kepplinger ha scritto: > Am 2014-05-17 19:21, schrieb Antti Palosaari: >> On 05/17/2014 07:05 PM, Martin Kepplinger wrote: >>> don't reinvent dev_dbg(). remove dprintk() in as102_drv.c. >>> use the common kernel coding style. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <martink@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> Reviewed-by: Antti Palosaari <crope@xxxxxx> >> >>> --- >>> this applies to next-20140516. any more suggestions? >>> more cleanup can be done when dprintk() is completely gone. >> >> Do you have the device? I am a bit reluctant patching that driver >> without any testing as it has happened too many times something has gone >> totally broken. > I don't have the device and will, at most, change such style issues. > >> >> IIRC Devin said it is in staging because of style issues and nothing >> more. Is that correct? > I haven't heard anything. A TODO file would help. Hi Antti, Martin, if I remember correctly, the main issue with this driver is that the device does not work anymore after a reboot: it needs a power cycle to start working again. Probably this issue is enough to keep the driver in staging. Regards, Gianluca > >> >> regards >> Antti >> > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
