Hello!
On Apr 27, 2014, at 1:33 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> I've applied these, except for the 3 gss patches.
Thanks.
gss stuff was kind of totally separate, tso I thought it was not so bad idea to include them,
but they are definitely not required.
> Also, there is now a build warning in the tree thanks to these, please
> send a follow-on patch to fix it before you get an email from the 0-day
> bot about it.
This one? I was under impression it was there before the pile of the patches as lustre/llite/symlink.c was last touched back in March and none of my patches touch it.
I'll have a patch for it shortly.
In file included from /home/green/bk/linux/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/../include/linux/lustre_compat25.h:41:0,
from /home/green/bk/linux/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/../include/linux/lvfs.h:48,
from /home/green/bk/linux/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/../include/lvfs.h:45,
from /home/green/bk/linux/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/../include/obd_support.h:41,
from /home/green/bk/linux/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/../include/obd_class.h:40,
from /home/green/bk/linux/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/../include/linux/lustre_lite.h:49,
from /home/green/bk/linux/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/../include/lustre_lite.h:45,
from /home/green/bk/linux/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/symlink.c:42:
/home/green/bk/linux/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/symlink.c: In function Б─≤ll_follow_linkБ─≥:
/home/green/bk/linux/include/linux/namei.h:88:29: warning: Б─≤symnameБ─≥ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
nd->saved_names[nd->depth] = path;
^
/home/green/bk/linux/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/symlink.c:123:8: note: Б─≤symnameБ─≥ was declared here
char *symname;
^
Bye,
Oleg
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
