Re: [PATCH] Staging:bcm: Fixes coding style issues in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:37:18PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote:
>> On 04/10/2014 07:56 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 07:27:27PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote:
>> >>> That's pretty obviously not going to apply properly, you have line-wrapp
>> >>> on.  You can't cut-and-paste patches into gmail, see
>> >>> Documentation/email_clients.txt for details.
>> >>>
>> >>> thanks,
>> >>>
>> >>> greg k-h
>> >>>
>> >> I'm so sorry about that. I already read it and configured Thunderbird as recommended. I just forgot to turn line wrap off.
>> >
>> > That worked, as this line shows :)
>> >
>> > But you put the patch at the end of the email, I can't do anything with
>> > it, I need it as a "clean" email, something I don't have to edit by hand
>> > when applying.
>> >
>> > Also...
>> >
>> >> -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo);
>> >> -static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct sk_buff* skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport);
>> >> +static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter,
>> >> +       PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo);
>> >> +
>> >> +static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter,
>> >> +       struct sk_buff *skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo,
>> >> +       struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport);
>> >>
>> >>  static USHORT  IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd,
>> >> -                          struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule);
>> >> +       struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule);
>> >
>> > What happened to the tabs?
>> >
>> > And why modify this last line, what was wrong with it?
>> >
>> > thanks,
>> >
>> > greg k-h
>> >
>>
>> Greg,
>>
>> Where you able to apply the patch successfully?
>
> I asked above what happened to the tabs, and why modify that line, so
> no, I did not apply it, as it doesn't look correct to me.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

In the last patch I sent, I believe I addressed the why modify that line issue.
However, I just realized that for whatever reason my tabs are being converted
to spaces when sending the email.  I'll try to work around this.  What email
client do you recommend for submitting patches?

Also, I sent a v2 patch and received and auto response from you. Should I
submitted the fixed patch as a v3 or continue in this thread?

thanks,
marcos
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux