Thanks for review. OK. I will try to change all of OS_kmalloc to kmalloc/kzalloc. And I also check GFP_DMA flag in kmalloc/kzalloc. Regards, Daeseok Youn 2014-03-05 19:04 GMT+09:00 Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 2014-03-05 at 03:37:15 +0100, Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/staging/cxt1e1/sbecom_inline_linux.h | 6 ++---- >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/cxt1e1/sbecom_inline_linux.h b/drivers/staging/cxt1e1/sbecom_inline_linux.h >> index ba3ff3e..6dd1b55 100644 >> --- a/drivers/staging/cxt1e1/sbecom_inline_linux.h >> +++ b/drivers/staging/cxt1e1/sbecom_inline_linux.h >> @@ -46,11 +46,9 @@ void pci_write_32 (u_int32_t *p, u_int32_t v); >> static inline void * >> OS_kmalloc (size_t size) >> { >> - char *ptr = kmalloc (size, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA); >> + char *ptr = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA); >> >> - if (ptr) >> - memset (ptr, 0, size); >> - return ptr; >> + return ptr; >> } > > It would probably be even better to get rid of this function altogether > and replace all calls to it by kmalloc/kzalloc. > > From a quick look at the users of OS_kmalloc, it also looks like GFP_DMA > isn't needed for all of them. > > Cheers > Tobias _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel