On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 20:35:50 +0800, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 08:22:21PM +0800, Zhao, Gang wrote: >> > If we add your patch and the reviewer does a search for fb[0] then it is >> > confusing what the right thing to do is. >> >> My fault. I should remove that two lines of code in >> et131x_rx_dma_memory_free(), although they don't break the code. >> > > Think about what you are saying here for a minute. Oh, a cold makes me stupid. that two lines of code is needed definitively. So is additional modification needed to let this patch be accepted ? > > regards, > dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
