On 02/03/2014 06:05 PM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Dan Carpenter
>> On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 09:57:39PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> It seems, our kernel still stick to treate 'pack' region have effect
>>> with both 'align' and 'sizeof'.
>>
>> It's not about packed regions. It's about unions. It's saying the
>> sizeof() a union is a multiple of 4 unless it's packed.
>>
>> union foo {
>> short x;
>> short y;
>> };
>>
>> The author intended the sizeof(union foo) to be 2 but on metag arch then
>> it is 4.
>
> The same is probably be true of: struct foo { _u16 bar; };
>
I guess so.
> Architectures that define such alignment rules are a right PITA.
Sorry, I do not know about PITA (after google or wiki, I can not get
more related information).
Could you provide more information about PITA, thanks?
> You either need to get the size to 2 without using 'packed', or
> just not define such structures.
Excuse me, I don't quite understand your meaning. I guess your meaning
is:
"normally, we should not use a struct/union like that, no matter what it is (2 or 4)".
Is it correct.
> It is worth seeing if adding aligned(2) will change the size - I'm
> not sure.
>
Yes, it will/should make sure that it must be 2.
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
Open, share and attitude like air, water and life which God blessed
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
