On 01/18/2014 10:24 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 06:26:10PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: >> On 01/18/2014 06:05 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote: >>> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 05:50:34PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: >>>> Unfortunately, not all compilers assumes the structures within a pack >>>> region also need be packed (e.g. metag), so need add a pack explicitly >>>> to satisfy all compilers. >>>> >>>> The related error (under metag with allmodconfig): >>>> >>>> CC [M] drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pack.o >>>> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pack.c: In function 'lov_getstripe': >>>> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pack.c:630: error: duplicate case value >>>> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pack.c:630: error: previously used here >>>> >>>> And originally, all related code used "__attribute__((packed))", so >>>> still use it instead of '__packed'. >>> >>> Use __packed. Then at least one line will be correct which is better >>> than nothing. >>> >> >> Hmm... but that will break the 'consistency' (which is not quite good >> for readers). >> >> For me, it will be better to provide another patch to change all >> "__attribute__((packed))" to "__packed" within this file. >> >> What about your ideas? >> > > In the end, it's not something we care about enough to ask you to redo > the patch. But what I'm saying is that you should prefer kernel style > over local style. We'll fix the surrounding lines later. > OK, thanks, and also thank James and "./scripts/checkpatch.pl" who/which also mentioned about it to me. BTW: this patch is related with another patch which is discussing (so I have cc that patch to you and Greg too): "if we could sure that it is a compiler's feature issue, we will skip this patch". Thanks -- Chen Gang Open, share and attitude like air, water and life which God blessed _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
