On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 03:24:14PM +0800, ZHAO Gang wrote: > As TODO file suggested, drop packet instead of return NETDEV_TX_BUSY > when tx failed. Really? That's ok to do? Seems like you are changing the logic of the function a lot here, how does the code let userspace know packets were dropped then? greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
