On Sat, 2013-11-02 at 17:40 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Sat, 02 Nov 2013 20:20:54 +0100 > Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > Those are obvious typos. Still present in v3.12-rc7. Perhaps you'd like > > to send the trivial patch to fix this? > > Yes, it is a typo... > > > > Probably, it was meant to say something like > > > > depends on SMS_USB_DRV = SMS_SDIO_DRV > > But this is not the right thing to do. The Kconfig logic here is that it > should depends on !SMS_SDIO_DRV or SMS_USB_DRV = SMS_SDIO_DRV. For the record: my reason for suggesting to Martin to send patches is that sending a (trivial) patch often turns out to be a quick way to get issues like that resolved. Maintainers seem to react quite quickly on patches. Perhaps even faster if a patch is not solving the issue at hand entirely correct! Messages like Martin's, that basically state that there are one or more tree-wide problems, seem to be overlooked easily. > I remember I made a patch like that while testing some things with this > driver, but it seems that I forgot to push. I might have it somewhere on > my test machine. Paul Bolle _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
