Hi Dan,
On Thursday 05 September 2013 20:16:39 Dan Carpenter wrote:
> I have introduced lradc_reg_set() and lradc_reg_clear(). It simplifies
> the callers and makes the lines shorter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c index a08c173..da5d04b 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> @@ -228,6 +228,16 @@ struct mxs_lradc {
> #define LRADC_RESOLUTION 12
> #define LRADC_SINGLE_SAMPLE_MASK ((1 << LRADC_RESOLUTION) - 1)
>
> +static void lradc_reg_set(struct mxs_lradc *lradc, u32 val, size_t chan)
> +{
> + writel(val, lradc->base + chan + STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET);
> +}
> +
> +static void lradc_reg_clear(struct mxs_lradc *lradc, u32 val, size_t chan)
> +{
> + writel(val, lradc->base + chan + STMP_OFFSET_REG_CLR);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Raw I/O operations
> */
> @@ -262,21 +272,18 @@ static int mxs_lradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev
> *iio_dev, * Virtual channel 0 is always used here as the others are always
> not * used if doing raw sampling.
> */
> - writel(LRADC_CTRL1_LRADC_IRQ_EN_MASK,
> - lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL1 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_CLR);
> - writel(0xff, lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL0 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_CLR);
> + lradc_reg_clear(lradc, LRADC_CTRL1_LRADC_IRQ_EN_MASK, LRADC_CTRL1);
> + lradc_reg_clear(lradc, 0xff, LRADC_CTRL0);
[...]
Oh, I did the same yesterday in preparation of the v2 of my patch series.
I will send this new version out today.
Regards,
Juergen
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Juergen Beisert |
Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
