On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 12:16:18PM +0200, Jürgen Beisert wrote: > I like this simplification, but all the other drivers for the MXS series of > SoCs don't use such a method. Do you think this "new style" will be accepted? > My lradc_plate_mask() is basically the same idea as what Marek said about putting the logic into the define. LRADC....IRQ_MASK(id) (((id) == MX23) ? 0x1ff : 0x1fff) I don't know why Marek is complaining about churn though. This is linux! We love churn! And especially in staging, it's our favorite thing. :P regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
