On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 19:02 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 05:10:04PM +0200, Iker Pedrosa wrote:
[]
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/winbond/phy_calibration.c b/drivers/staging/winbond/phy_calibration.c
[]
> > @@ -1233,8 +1233,10 @@ u8 _rx_iq_calibration_loop_winbond(struct hw_data *phw_data, u16 factor, u32 fre
> > b_2 = (rot_image_q_b * 32768) / rot_tone_i_b -
> > phw_data->iq_rsdl_phase_tx_d2;
> >
> > - PHY_DEBUG(("[CAL] ** iq_rsdl_gain_tx_d2 = %d\n", phw_data->iq_rsdl_gain_tx_d2));
> > - PHY_DEBUG(("[CAL] ** iq_rsdl_phase_tx_d2= %d\n", phw_data->iq_rsdl_phase_tx_d2));
> > + PHY_DEBUG(("[CAL] ** iq_rsdl_gain_tx_d2 = %d\n",
> > + phw_data->iq_rsdl_gain_tx_d2));
>
> Don't redo this, but really these should be aligned like this:
>
> PHY_DEBUG(("[CAL] ** iq_rsdl_gain_tx_d2 = %d\n",
> phw_data->iq_rsdl_gain_tx_d2));
>
> In the end, we're going to remove all these debugging prints so it's
> not worth redoing in a later patch. What you have is fine. The
> message itself is sort of nonsense.
Especially true because the only #define for PHY_DEBUG is:
#define PHY_DEBUG(msg, args...)
None of this does anything anyway.
It'd be better to send a removal of the whole lot.
Does anyone still use this driver?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
