On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:18:00PM +0000, Paul Zimmerman wrote: > > From: popcornmix [mailto:popcornmix@xxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 6:39 AM > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Paul, did you try the patch without this hunk? > > > Dom, can you tell use why this hunk is needed? > > > > The microframe patch originally came from here: > > > > http://git.denx.de/?p=linux-denx.git;a=commit;h=661a47d4cec90545dce32926757ee0a95b9100d2 > > which should be acknowledged. I don't see the that hunk in this patch, or our implementation of it: > > > > https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/commit/5cc98c1e75700e51e4a31d8a05b4a55a7d29648c > > Can you point at the raspberry pi commit it came from? > > Hi Greg, > > Is it necessary to also get signed-off-bys from whoever at Denx did the > original work on the patch? Or can I just acknowledge that in the commit > message? You can acknowledge it, if there's no way to get a signed-off-by from them (and it looks like it will be hard.). thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
