On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 01:54:56PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 24, 2013 01:41:57 PM Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Wed 24-07-13 12:32:32, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Wednesday, July 24, 2013 12:04:41 PM Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > On Wed 24-07-13 12:02:35, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > I have posted a similar fix quite some time ago and I guess Greg should > > > > > already have it. > > > > > > > > For reference https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/26/410 > > > > > > There was a reply from Greg: > > > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/26/410 > > > > I guess you meant https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/26/569 > > Uh, yes. > > > > and it seems that Greg's request has not been fullfilled. > > > > Bob Liu has resent the patch (I cannot find the email in the archive). > > Indeed, I've found it here: > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/102484 > > > > Anyway Piotr's patch seems to be more complete: > > > - it also fixes case in which invalid "zcache=" option is given (returns > > > an error value 1 while with your patch the code still erronously retuns 0) > > > - it prints information about compressor type being used when "zcache=" > > > option is used (your patch skips it due to addition of "goto out_alloc") > > > > I do not care which one will make it I just pointed out that there is > > another patch dealing with the same and it is a question how far that > > one went. > > OK. > > Greg, could you please pick Piotr's patch? Wait, I'm going to take the first one I got, from Michal, as that's the original author here, not Piotr... confused, and really grumpy about the whole zcache mess... greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
