On Wednesday, July 24, 2013 01:41:57 PM Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 24-07-13 12:32:32, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Wednesday, July 24, 2013 12:04:41 PM Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Wed 24-07-13 12:02:35, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > I have posted a similar fix quite some time ago and I guess Greg should > > > > already have it. > > > > > > For reference https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/26/410 > > > > There was a reply from Greg: > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/26/410 > > I guess you meant https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/26/569 Uh, yes. > > and it seems that Greg's request has not been fullfilled. > > Bob Liu has resent the patch (I cannot find the email in the archive). Indeed, I've found it here: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/102484 > > Anyway Piotr's patch seems to be more complete: > > - it also fixes case in which invalid "zcache=" option is given (returns > > an error value 1 while with your patch the code still erronously retuns 0) > > - it prints information about compressor type being used when "zcache=" > > option is used (your patch skips it due to addition of "goto out_alloc") > > I do not care which one will make it I just pointed out that there is > another patch dealing with the same and it is a question how far that > one went. OK. Greg, could you please pick Piotr's patch? Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
