Re: [PATCH 0/5] Radio device framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




This framework will be re-sent for drivers/ folder after it gets
approval for staging.

What does this sentance mean?

Why are you submitting this for drivers/staging/?  I do not see a TODO file that lists what needs to be done to this code to get it out of the staging tree, that is required.
[Akhil] yes this driver do not have any TODO file but as per my
understanding, any new driver shall be first sent to staging folder

Where is that documented?  Who told you that?  That is _not_ what the
drivers/staging/ tree is for at all.

got it, I misinterpreted the purpose of drivers/staging.


but if it is ok to send the patches directly to drivers/ folder then I
will resend this patch set by rebasing it to drivers/ folder.

Does this really deserve its own subdirectory in drivers/ ?

Why not use the newly introduced phy layer instead?

I will look into phy layer to understand how this driver can be fitted in phy layer.

This driver contains controller (Antenna controller)and RF PHY (AD9361). PHY driver can register with PHY layer, but where do I place the antenna controller driver, there is no specific directory in drivers for antenna controllers?

Thanks,
Akhil


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux