Re: [PATCH 0/5] Radio device framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:47:48PM +0000, Goyal Akhil-B35197 wrote:

Please fix your email client to properly quote things.

> > This framework will be re-sent for drivers/ folder after it gets 
> > approval for staging.
> 
> What does this sentance mean?
> 
> Why are you submitting this for drivers/staging/?  I do not see a TODO file that lists what needs to be done to this code to get it out of the staging tree, that is required.
> [Akhil] yes this driver do not have any TODO file but as per my
> understanding, any new driver shall be first sent to staging folder

Where is that documented?  Who told you that?  That is _not_ what the
drivers/staging/ tree is for at all.

> but if it is ok to send the patches directly to drivers/ folder then I
> will resend this patch set by rebasing it to drivers/ folder.

Does this really deserve its own subdirectory in drivers/ ?

Why not use the newly introduced phy layer instead?

> [Akhil] I will resend the patches after rebasing it to drivers/ folder
> if it is ok?

Please work with other kernel developers within Freescale as to how the
proper way to submit code to the kernel is done.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux