On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 03:56 -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> I don't think the DVFS code in tidspbridge ever worked in an upstream >> kernel. > > What does "upstream" mean here? Does it refer to a kernel based on > Linus' tree or to a kernel based on (some) TI OMAP related tree, with > code not (yet) in Linus' tree? I meant Linus' tree, but actually that's the case for any public tree AFAIK. It did work in some internal Nokia tree, but that version of DVFS never made it to the public, and when DVFS finally landed on upstream, I don't think anybody from Nokia was working on that code any more. I vaguely recall Nishant Menon mentioning that he wanted to fix this, but that was a long long time ago. I think the patch would be rather small, but I don't have setup nor the expertise at the moment to actually write it. -- Felipe Contreras _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
