On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 04:28:36PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 11:51 AM > > To: KY Srinivasan; Michael S. Tsirkin > > Cc: olaf@xxxxxxxxx; bp@xxxxxxxxx; apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; x86@xxxxxxxxxx; > > tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; hpa@xxxxxxxxx > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3] X86: Add a check to catch Xen emulation of Hyper-V > > > > >>> On 17.04.13 at 17:31, KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > If Xen were to change where it would not unconditionally emulate Hyper-V, I > > > would not be opposed to taking > > > this check out. > > > > But it doesn't do this unconditionally, only upon admin request. > > >From the discussion we had a couple of months ago, the default setting was to enable > Hyper-V emulation for all guests. If this is not the case, we ought to be able to drop this. > However, I think it is not reasonable to add additional checks (in addition to hypervisor check) > to customize the run-time in the guest for the specific Hypervisor. > > Regards, > > K. Y Parse error. What are you trying to say? I'm just saying it's best to do things in the way that make it possible for Xen to implement hyperv in a more complete way in the future and have things just work and in a way that does not change guest/hypervisor interface. > > > > Jan > > > > > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
