Re: Question about printking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Joe,

On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 16:30 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>> ptr = kmalloc(sizeof(foo));
>> if (!ptr) {
>>         pr_err("Cannot allocate memory for foo\n");
>>         return -ENOMEM;
>> }
>> His argue against it was that kmalloc already takes care of reporting/printking
>> a good deal of interesting information when this happens.
>
>> Can someone expand a bit on this whole idea? (of abuse of printing,
>> or futility of printing).
>
> k.alloc() takes a GFP_ flag as an arg.
>
> One of those GFP flags is __GFP_NOWARN.
>
> For all failed allocs without GFP_NOWARN
> a message is emitted and a dump_stack is
> done.
>
> (see: mm/page_alloc.c warn_alloc_failed())
>
> So, most all of these printks after
> k.alloc()'s are not necessary.
>
>

Thanks for the explanation.

BTW, I see you've made some patches to fix exactly this.
Nice job.

Regards,

-- 
    Ezequiel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux