Question about printking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

I have a quick question.
I (think I) remember Greg KH reviewing some driver patch on staging
mailing list,
suggesting not to do this sort of printking upon an allocation request failure:

ptr = kmalloc(sizeof(foo));
if (!ptr) {
        pr_err("Cannot allocate memory for foo\n");
        return -ENOMEM;
}

His argue against it was that kmalloc already takes care of reporting/printking
a good deal of interesting information when this happens.

Is my memory right?

Can someone expand a bit on this whole idea? (of abuse of printing,
or futility of printing).

I'm asking after seeing *a lot* of drivers doing exactly this.

Thanks,

--
    Ezequiel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux