Re: [PATCH 0/5] staging: tidspbridge: for 3.9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 05:45:16PM -0600, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 03:36:57AM -0600, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
> >> Patches for staging-next, fixing comments and suggestions provided
> >> by Chen Gang.
> >>
> >> There is an additional scm patch, that removes hardcoded defines
> >> related to direct register handling for SCM, it was dependent on
> >> changes that already made it to mainline.
> >
> > What is the status on getting this out of the staging tree?
> 
> I'm currently working to do this.
> 
> >  What needs
> > to be done still?
> 
> - There is a tasklet that I'm working to remove.
> - Some portions could be fitted into remoteproc (as Tony mentions).
> - Migration to generic iommu framework.
> - Need to rework patches to use request_firmware.
> - And a thorough cleanup to get rid of if-else nesting.

That looks good, care to update the TODO file for the driver in the
kernel to reflect this?

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux