Hi Tony, On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [130117 16:51]: >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 03:36:57AM -0600, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote: >> > Patches for staging-next, fixing comments and suggestions provided >> > by Chen Gang. >> > >> > There is an additional scm patch, that removes hardcoded defines >> > related to direct register handling for SCM, it was dependent on >> > changes that already made it to mainline. >> >> What is the status on getting this out of the staging tree? What needs >> to be done still? > > Omar, please correct me if I'm wrong. This thing should be reimplemented > using remoteproc AFAIK. tidspbridge might be able to use remoteproc, however it can't get rid of all the infrastructure to support the SN interface, given that the SN and firmware are distributed as binaries. OTOH, remoteproc can also implement support for omap3 dsp, but the major drawback is that we will lose the distributed codecs along with gst-dsp support. > But I doubt that anybody is working on making it happen? I'm not aware of anybody working on remoteproc for omap3 (eventually I could pick it up) but I'm more focused on getting tidspbridge out of staging right now. Cheers, Omar _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
