Am Sonntag, 20. Januar 2013, 09:11:50 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: > On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 10:55:29PM +0100, Markus Grabner wrote: > > Am Freitag, 18. Januar 2013, 16:57:31 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: > > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:52:14PM +0100, Markus Grabner wrote: > > > > The function "line6_send_raw_message_async" now has an additional > > > > argument > > > > "bool copy", which indicates whether the supplied buffer should be > > > > copied > > > > into a dynamically allocated block of memory. The copy flag is also > > > > stored in the "message" struct such that the temporary memory can be > > > > freed when appropriate without intervention of the caller. > > > > > > Why do this? Why not either always copy it, or always not? > > > > Some messages are sent to the device which have no parameters, they are > > declared at global scope as constant byte arrays and therefore must be > > copied into a dynamically allocated block of memory in order to be sent > > over the USB interface. On the other hand, there are messages which do > > have parameters and which are composed in dynamically allocated memory > > and can therefore directly be sent without copying. > > Then if you always copy the memory, and "own" it after the call, you > should be fine, right? > > > > What is this fixing? > > > > Two users reported to me independently that the driver doesn't work for > > them. I couldn't reproduce the problem since it seems to be triggered by > > subtle timing issues in the system, but after some further > > investigations, the kfree() of the message buffer immediately after > > submitting the message for asynchronous transmission was clearly > > identified as the reason for the driver not working. The patch puts the > > kfree() at the right place and (hopefully) prevents incorrect use of the > > new buffer copy feature. The patch is tested by me and the users who > > initially reported the bug, and they confirmed that the issue is fixed > > for them. > > > > If anybody has a better idea how to fix this, please go ahead! The patch > > might also become obsolete in the future due to refactoring. But > > currently there is a bug which prevents some people from using the driver > > at all, and this should be fixed soon IMO. > > I agree, it should be fixed, but having the code always do the copy and > manage the memory, and not have the crazy "flag" option, should solve > the bug for everyone. Removing the flag saves three lines of code, keeping the flag saves a tiny amount of time and memory, so it's not really worth a lengthy discussion, and I actually don't care much. I will focus on the user space library I'm currently working on since it will make much of the MIDI-related Line6 kernel driver code obsolete. On the other hand, would it be possible in usb_submit_urb to detect whether the data pointer provided to it is suitable for DMA, and if not, transparently make a copy and free it if no longer used (or, by the same argument as above, just always make a copy)? Kind regards, Markus _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
