On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 07:15:22PM +0100, Markus Grabner wrote:
> On Thursday 06 December 2012 06:18:02 Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/line6/driver.c
> > > b/drivers/staging/line6/driver.c index 8a5d89e..884e0d8 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/line6/driver.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/line6/driver.c
> > > @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ struct message {
> > >
> > > */
> > > static void line6_data_received(struct urb *urb);
> > > static int line6_send_raw_message_async_part(struct message *msg,
> > >
> > > - struct urb *urb);
> > > + struct urb *urb, int free);
> >
> > s/int/bool/
> >
> > > /*
> > >
> > > Start to listen on endpoint.
> > >
> > > @@ -219,24 +219,42 @@ static void line6_async_request_sent(struct urb
> > > *urb)
> > >
> > > usb_free_urb(urb);
> > > kfree(msg);
> > >
> > > } else
> > >
> > > - line6_send_raw_message_async_part(msg, urb);
> > > + line6_send_raw_message_async_part(msg, urb, 0);
> > > +}
> >
> > I'd add a bool free_buffer field to struct message and simply modify
> > line6_async_request_sent() to do:
> >
> > if (msg->free_buffer)
> > kfree(msg->buffer);
> >
> > Then you don't need line6_async_request_sent_free_buffer() and
> > line6_send_raw_message_async_part() doesn't need to take a bool free
> > argument since struct message already contains that information. It
> > would make the code simpler.
> Considering the suggestions made so far, I came up with the following
> solution: the function "line6_send_raw_message_async" now has an additional
> argument "bool copy", which indicates whether the supplied buffer should be
> copied into a dynamically allocated block of memory. The copy flag is also
> stored in the "message" struct such that the temporary memory can be freed
> when appropriate without intervention of the caller.
>
> The patch is against linux-next since this bug should be fixed regardless of
> the status of moving the Line6 driver out of the staging area.
>
> Reported-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Grabner <grabner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Can you resend this in a format I can apply it in (proper Subject, not
line-wrapped, etc.)
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
