On Thu, 8 Nov 2012 14:14:35 -0800 (PST) David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 8 Nov 2012, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > I don't think you should export the symbol itself to modules but rather a > > > > helper function that returns s64 that just wraps > > > > percpu_counter_read_positive() which your driver could use instead. > > > > > > > > (And why percpu_counter_read_positive() returns a signed type is a > > > > mystery.) > > > > > > Yes, this makes sense. I just want to access (read) this metric. Andrew, if you are willing to > > > take this patch, I could send one. > > > > Sure. I suppose that's better, although any module which modifies > > committed_as would never pass review (rofl). > > > > I was thinking of a function that all hypervisors can use (since xen also > uses it) that can be well documented and maintain the semantics that they > expect, whether that relines on vm_commited_as in the future or not. Yes, it would be nice to have some central site where people can go to understand what's happening here. It's still unclear to me that committed_as is telling the hypervisors precisely what they want to know. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
