RE: [PATCH] drivers: hv: use Linux version in guest ID

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 11:27 AM
> To: Bjørn Mork
> Cc: KY Srinivasan; Paolo Bonzini; devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: hv: use Linux version in guest ID
> 
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:03:08AM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > Use OS version number in the guest ID as recommended by Microsoft
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > So how about something like this?  Yes, I know including
> > linux/version.h often is unwanted, but the spec does
> > recommend using the actual OS version in the guest ID
> >
> > Yes, this will be offensive again when Linux is at
> > version 181.0, but we might have found a better solution by
> > then :-)
> >
> >
> >  drivers/hv/hyperv_vmbus.h |   20 ++++++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hv/hyperv_vmbus.h b/drivers/hv/hyperv_vmbus.h
> > index b9426a6..cc0c3f0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hv/hyperv_vmbus.h
> > +++ b/drivers/hv/hyperv_vmbus.h
> > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> >  #include <asm/sync_bitops.h>
> >  #include <linux/atomic.h>
> >  #include <linux/hyperv.h>
> > +#include <linux/version.h>
> >
> >  /*
> >   * The below CPUID leaves are present if
> VersionAndFeatures.HypervisorPresent
> > @@ -410,10 +411,21 @@ enum {
> >
> >  #define HV_PRESENT_BIT			0x80000000
> >
> > -#define HV_LINUX_GUEST_ID_LO		0x00000000
> > -#define HV_LINUX_GUEST_ID_HI		0xB16B00B5
> > -#define HV_LINUX_GUEST_ID		(((u64)HV_LINUX_GUEST_ID_HI
> << 32) | \
> > -					   HV_LINUX_GUEST_ID_LO)
> > +/* Linux vendor ID allocated by Microsoft */
> > +#define HV_LINUX_GUEST_ID_VENDOR	0xB16B
> > +
> > +/* Creating a guest ID conforming to the encoding recommended by
> > + * Microsoft, with variant and build fixed to 0
> 
> We could use the kernel build number here as well, if we really wanted
> it, right?
> 
> Otherwise, I like this patch, KY, any objection to me taking it?

Greg,

If it is ok with you can we wait a couple of days. I am pushing to get information
back from folks within MSFT. I am hoping  we can fix this issue soon.

Regards,

K. Y
 



_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux