On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:59:55AM -0700, H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > for (i = 0; i < num_subdevices; ++i) { > - dev->subdevices[i].device = dev; > - dev->subdevices[i].async_dma_dir = DMA_NONE; > - spin_lock_init(&dev->subdevices[i].spin_lock); > - dev->subdevices[i].minor = -1; > + s = dev->subdevices + i; You don't have to resend, but I think this would look better as: s = &dev->subdevices[i]; > + s->device = dev; > + s->async_dma_dir = DMA_NONE; > + spin_lock_init(&s->spin_lock); > + s->minor = -1; > } Btw, this patchset is great. Nice. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel