On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 10:25 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 08:56:36AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez wrote: > > As there is no pr_* function used here, pr_fmt is not needed. > > > > Nah. What about if we decide to add some? Also there are actually > a couple pr_err() calls in there already. Oops, you are right! Forget this patch! Thanks, Sam
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
