Re: [PATCH] Staging: ipack: remove pr_fmt definition.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 08:56:36AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez wrote:
> As there is no pr_* function used here, pr_fmt is not needed.
> 

Nah.  What about if we decide to add some?  Also there are actually
a couple pr_err() calls in there already.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux