On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:39:13PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 21:45 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > >> Would some of these patches (e.g., at least patches 1, 2, and 5) be > >> appropriate for inclusion in the 3.0.y and 3.2.y stable kernels from > >> kernel.org? > > > > Assuming they haven't caused any regressions, I think everything except > > 9b98d6067971 (4/5) would be appropriate. > > Great. Here are the aforementioned patches rebased against 3.0.y, in > the hope that some interested person can confirm they still work. The > only backporting needed was to adjust to the lack of > drivers/staging/lirc -> drivers/staging/media/lirc renaming. So they should also go to 3.2-stable, right? greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
