Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 21:45 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Would some of these patches (e.g., at least patches 1, 2, and 5) be >> appropriate for inclusion in the 3.0.y and 3.2.y stable kernels from >> kernel.org? > > Assuming they haven't caused any regressions, I think everything except > 9b98d6067971 (4/5) would be appropriate. Great. Here are the aforementioned patches rebased against 3.0.y, in the hope that some interested person can confirm they still work. The only backporting needed was to adjust to the lack of drivers/staging/lirc -> drivers/staging/media/lirc renaming. Ben Hutchings (4): [media] staging: lirc_serial: Fix init/exit order [media] staging: lirc_serial: Free resources on failure paths of lirc_serial_probe() [media] staging: lirc_serial: Fix deadlock on resume failure [media] staging: lirc_serial: Do not assume error codes returned by request_irq() drivers/staging/lirc/lirc_serial.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
