On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:52:48PM -0800, Sean MacLennan wrote: > The rtl8192e driver had a natural split between the more generic > rtllib code and the more specific rtl8192e code. This patch splits the > driver into two parts and six drivers: rtllib, rtllib_crypt, > rtllib_crypt_ccmp, rtllib_crypt_tkip, rtllib_crypt_wep and r8192e. > > Most of the code changes where either infrastructure (get it building), > or the exporting of symbols from rtllib to the r8192e driver. > > Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <seanm@xxxxxxxx> There are *STILL* unneeded code changes in here... Seriously, everyone else manages to separate changes out into different patches. It's not hard to do. I hate to make people redo patches over and over again so normally if I miss something small the first time then I don't point it out on the second review round. But in this case, I'm just saying the same thing over and over and I don't understand, am I not being clear? regards, dan carpenter
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
