Re: [PATCH staging 6/6] et131x: uncloak PCIe capabilities.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark Einon <mark.einon@xxxxxxxxx> :
[...]
> The PCIe changes are good, however I think using gotos here doesn't add
> anything as there's no difficult locking to navigate and makes the code
> harder to read.
> both out: and err_out: are used to return an error, and the backwards
> jumping goto makes me a bit uncomfortable. Could you respin with just the
> PCIe changes?

I confess I use a 55 lines vi split terminal when reviewing these blocks.

As there is no documentation to check the remaining PCIe candidate bits,
it's probably not worth it anyway.

-- 
Ueimor
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux