Mark Einon <mark.einon@xxxxxxxxx> : > Replaced pci map/unmap and set_mask calls with their dma equivalents. > Also updated comments to reflect this. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Einon <mark.einon@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++------------------- > 1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c b/drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c > index 993f93a..1c11dfd 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c > @@ -3202,59 +3202,59 @@ static int nic_send_packet(struct et131x_adapter *adapter, struct tcb *tcb) [...] > desc[frag++].addr_lo = > - pci_map_single(adapter->pdev, > + dma_map_single(&adapter->pdev->dev, > skb->data, > skb->len - > skb->data_len, > - PCI_DMA_TODEVICE); > + DMA_TO_DEVICE); > } else { - Some dma_mapping_error() would be welcome. - (nit) If you keep repeating &adapter->pdev->dev, you may consider adding some local variable - could you rework the Tx path as well so that despite the cascade of method the code does not end fighting for the right end of the screen ? et131x_tx is almost empty. It could make some sense to merge it with its callee (and rename it et131x_start_xmit ?). - nic_send_packet for (i = 0; i < nr_frags; i++) { [...comment..] if (i == 0) { Lovely... [big block] } else { [small block] } ... really, really lovely. } [...] > /* NOTE: Here, the dma_addr_t returned from > - * pci_map_single() is implicitly cast as a > + * dma_map_single() is implicitly cast as a > * u32. Although dma_addr_t can be > * 64-bit, the address returned by > - * pci_map_single() is always 32-bit > + * dma_map_single() is always 32-bit > * addressable (as defined by the pci/dma > * subsystem) > */ > desc[frag++].addr_lo = [...] > desc[frag].addr_hi = 0; - The NOTE seems a bit outdated. Afaiks the driver tries to set a 64 bits wide DMA mask. Both addr_lo and addr_hi should be set with the returned mapping and/or even replaced with a single 64 bits addr field in tx_desc. - Speaking of it, tx_desc probably lacks some __leXY annotations. - (nic_send_packet) { u32 i; struct tx_desc desc[24]; /* 24 x 16 byte */ 384 bytes. :o/ -- Ueimor _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel