Re: [PATCH 0/4] [RESEND v6] VME Framework Fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 01:17:32PM +0100, Martyn Welch wrote:
> On 11/10/11 13:04, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:56:32PM +0100, Martyn Welch wrote:
> >> On 26/09/11 10:27, Manohar Vanga wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I start by apologizing for my absence recently as I was away on vacation
> >>> for a few weeks. Picking up where I left off, this is the resend of the
> >>> two final patches along with some movement of code into additional patches.
> >>>
> >>> Martyn, Emilio: Thanks for all the feedback :-)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>> Manohar
> >>>
> >>> Manohar Vanga (4):
> >>>   staging: vme: add struct vme_dev for VME devices
> >>>   staging: vme: make match() driver specific to improve non-VME64x
> >>>     support
> >>>   staging: vme: get rid of struct vme_device_id and slots
> >>>   staging: vme_user: rename USER_BUS_MAX to VME_USER_BUS_MAX
> >>>
> >>>  drivers/staging/vme/devices/vme_user.c |   67 +++-----
> >>>  drivers/staging/vme/devices/vme_user.h |    2 +-
> >>>  drivers/staging/vme/vme.c              |  284 +++++++++++++++-----------------
> >>>  drivers/staging/vme/vme.h              |   50 ++++--
> >>>  drivers/staging/vme/vme_api.txt        |   90 ++++++-----
> >>>  drivers/staging/vme/vme_bridge.h       |    6 +-
> >>>  6 files changed, 246 insertions(+), 253 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hi Guys,
> >>
> >> Sorry for the lack of communication from my end. I've had to take paternity
> >> leave a little earlier than expected (I wasn't expecting to be AFK for another
> >> few days). I haven't had a chance to sit down and look over and try out these
> >> patches as I'd like to. I'll probably be rather tied up for about another week
> >> I'm afraid...
> > 
> > No problem, if you don't object, I'll be glad to review these and apply
> > them if they look sane to me, otherwise I can wait for you to get some
> > spare time to do so.
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> I think that would probably be best, I started to look over the patches before
> leaving work in a bit of a hurry. Don't think I saw anything that I has overly
> concerned about. I'd have preferred to have run it up on a board, but in the
> circumstances I'd prefer not to impede these improvements to the VME driver code.

Ok, I'll take a look at this later this week (hopefully, I'm at a
conference all week...)

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux