> -----Original Message----- > From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 10:05 PM > To: KY Srinivasan > Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Haiyang Zhang > Subject: Re: [PATCH 097/117] Staging: hv: storvsc: Add code to handle IDE devices > using the storvsc driver > > Thanks, this looks much cleaner than the initial variant. > > > + if (dev_is_ide) { > > + storvsc_get_ide_info(device, &target, &path); > > + host_dev->path = device_info.path_id; > > + host_dev->target = device_info.target_id; > > + } else { > > + host_dev->path = device_info.path_id; > > + host_dev->target = device_info.target_id; > > + } > > Is using the device_info values in both branches intentional? If so > there's no need to have these assignments duplicated. While we set the values in both the branches, the value set is different; The IDE side encodes the bits differently and is appropriately parsed in the function storvsc_get_ide_info(). Regards, K. Y _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
