Thanks, this looks much cleaner than the initial variant.
> + if (dev_is_ide) {
> + storvsc_get_ide_info(device, &target, &path);
> + host_dev->path = device_info.path_id;
> + host_dev->target = device_info.target_id;
> + } else {
> + host_dev->path = device_info.path_id;
> + host_dev->target = device_info.target_id;
> + }
Is using the device_info values in both branches intentional? If so
there's no need to have these assignments duplicated.
> + if (dev_is_ide) {
> + ret = scsi_add_device(host, 0, target, 0);
> + if (ret) {
> + scsi_remove_host(host);
> + goto err_out;
> + }
I'd add another goto error label for this piece of error handling.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
