On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 12:34 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:28:44AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 12:22 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > > > warn: returning -1 instead of -ENOMEM is sloppy > > > > out of curiosity -- why does it say "instead of -ENOMEM"? -1 really gets > > interpreted as "-EPERM" (since EPERM == 1) > > It's for an allocation failure. The code returns -1 (-EPERM) but it > should be returning -ENOMEM. Ah, so it looks at the context of it, cool. johannes _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
