On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:28:44AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 12:22 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > warn: returning -1 instead of -ENOMEM is sloppy > > out of curiosity -- why does it say "instead of -ENOMEM"? -1 really gets > interpreted as "-EPERM" (since EPERM == 1) It's for an allocation failure. The code returns -1 (-EPERM) but it should be returning -ENOMEM. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
