I wonder if this patch improves code readability
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Ravishankar <ravishankarkm32@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Ravishankar <ravi.shankar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This is a patch to the unioxx5.c file that fixes up a warning:line over 80 charcter found by the checkpatch.pl tool
>
> Signed-off-by: Ravishankar <ravishankarkm32@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/unioxx5.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/unioxx5.c b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/unioxx5.c
> index 598884e..9b311c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/unioxx5.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/unioxx5.c
> @@ -75,8 +75,13 @@ Devices: [Fastwel] UNIOxx-5 (unioxx5),
> /* 'private' structure for each subdevice */
> struct unioxx5_subd_priv {
> int usp_iobase;
> - unsigned char usp_module_type[12]; /* 12 modules. each can be 70L or 73L */
> - unsigned char usp_extra_data[12][4]; /* for saving previous written value for analog modules */
> + unsigned char usp_module_type[12]; /* 12 modules. each can be 70L
> + * or 73L
> + */
> + unsigned char usp_extra_data[12][4]; /* for saving previous written
> + * value for analog modules
> + */
> +
> unsigned char usp_prev_wr_val[3]; /* previous written value */
> unsigned char usp_prev_cn_val[3]; /* previous channel value */
> };
> @@ -398,7 +402,10 @@ static int __unioxx5_digital_read(struct unioxx5_subd_priv *usp,
> *data &= mask;
>
> if (channel_offset > 1)
> - channel -= 2 << channel_offset; /* this operation is created for correct readed value to 0 or 1 */
> + channel -= 2 << channel_offset; /* this operation is created for
> + * correct readed value to
> + * 0 or 1
> + */
>
> *data >>= channel;
> return 1;
> @@ -444,7 +451,9 @@ static int __unioxx5_analog_write(struct unioxx5_subd_priv *usp,
> usp->usp_extra_data[module][i] = (unsigned char)((*data & 0xFF00) >> 8);
>
> /* while(!((inb(usp->usp_iobase + 0)) & TxBE)); */
> - outb(module + 1, usp->usp_iobase + 5); /* sending module number to card(1 .. 12) */
> + outb(module + 1, usp->usp_iobase + 5); /* sending module number
> + * to card (1..12)
> + */
> outb('W', usp->usp_iobase + 6); /* sends (W)rite command to module */
>
> /* sending for bytes to module(one byte per cycle iteration) */
> @@ -475,7 +484,9 @@ static int __unioxx5_analog_read(struct unioxx5_subd_priv *usp,
> }
>
> __unioxx5_analog_config(usp, channel);
> - outb(module_no + 1, usp->usp_iobase + 5); /* sends module number to card(1 .. 12) */
> + outb(module_no + 1, usp->usp_iobase + 5); /* sends module number
> + * to card (1. .12)
> + */
> outb('V', usp->usp_iobase + 6); /* sends to module (V)erify command */
> control = inb(usp->usp_iobase); /* get control register byte */
>
> --
> 1.6.5.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
--
Regards,
Denis
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
