On 5/20/11, Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Don't worry about "cluttering" up the mailing list, send them to me, and >> to the driver devel mailing list, and I will take them just fine. > > I'm talking about linux-wireless mailing list. And yes, I really think > that sending patches like removing A_MEMSET() is cluttering the mailing > list. I would rather see wireless hackers doing something productive > than reading patches like that. > Mutt has a short cut to delete a whole thread. You learn that quickly enough when you deal with Greg KH. Anyway, those patches aren't hard to review. I use a script for it: http://marc.info/?l=linux-driver-devel&m=129699522622014&w=2 It strips out the whitespace changes and the pure sed work and it only shows interesting changes. You can invoke it directly from mutt so it takes about 30 seconds to look over each patch. I'm not saying that everything should get sent to lkml, but those patches are fine on the driver devel list. The rule that everything should go to a public mailing list is a good one. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
