On Thursday 28 April 2011, Weil, Oren jer wrote: > > >On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:53:01PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> I still think this should be a regular watchdog driver using the > >> drivers/watchdog user interface. > > > >I agree, Oren, if you are going to insist on doing things this way, you had > >better describe why you are ignoring the existing kernel interfaces > >provided. > > we are not going to ignore the existing interfaces, it is one of our items > in the TODO list. > You can see the we move all of the Watchdog code to a single file so it > would easy to us to take it later to other driver. > Another Item on our TODO list is to expose Kernel function that equivalent > to user interface so kernel clients > can access FW features/clients. Ok, fair enough. Please put important information like this into the changelog next time. Also, your TODO file seems to be missing form the submission. Arnd _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
