>On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:53:01PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> I still think this should be a regular watchdog driver using the >> drivers/watchdog user interface. > >I agree, Oren, if you are going to insist on doing things this way, you had >better describe _why_ you are ignoring the existing kernel interfaces >provided. we are not going to ignore the existing interfaces, it is one of our items in the TODO list. You can see the we move all of the Watchdog code to a single file so it would easy to us to take it later to other driver. Another Item on our TODO list is to expose Kernel function that equivalent to user interface so kernel clients can access FW features/clients. --- Oren Weil - Intel Corporation. http://www.intel.com
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
