On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 02:43:12PM -0800, Daniel West wrote: > Fixed a checkpatch warning: > > WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines > #4595: FILE: drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:4595: > +/**************************************************************************** > + > > The code is full of comments like this. Should the coding style > be inforced here, even when there is a logic to the way the code > was broken up? You should make one patch which atleast fix one file at ones. It would be even better if it fixes whole stuff (example one driver) right a way. Also note that you should not but this kind messages to your patch message. If you want to note this kind of thing you can use --- and after that it will not included in patch itself. You can read it online more. Also where does this [PATCH 8455/8455] even come from? Good thing is that you really didn't send so many patches or atleast I won't see them. And it seems that you are new so welcome a board :) -- Kari Argillander _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
