Fixed a checkpatch warning: WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines #4595: FILE: drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:4595: +/**************************************************************************** + The code is full of comments like this. Should the coding style be inforced here, even when there is a logic to the way the code was broken up? Signed-off-by: Daniel West <daniel.west.dev@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c index 8794907a39f4..adf2788a416f 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c @@ -4591,11 +4591,10 @@ void mlmeext_sta_del_event_callback(struct adapter *padapter) } } -/**************************************************************************** - -Following are the functions for the timer handlers - -*****************************************************************************/ +/* + * + *Following are the functions for the timer handlers + */ static u8 chk_ap_is_alive(struct adapter *padapter, struct sta_info *psta) { -- 2.25.1 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel