On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:40:21AM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> Rename show_engine_regs to engine_regs_show as per the convention
> followed. Issue reported by checkpatch script.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.c b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.c
> index 7698e5ef2a7c..b6d1afbd452d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.c
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static void kpc_dma_del_device(struct kpc_dma_device *ldev)
> }
>
> /********** SysFS Attributes **********/
> -static ssize_t show_engine_regs(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +static ssize_t engine_regs_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> {
> struct kpc_dma_device *ldev;
> struct platform_device *pldev = to_platform_device(dev);
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static ssize_t show_engine_regs(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *at
> ldev->desc_completed
> );
> }
> -static DEVICE_ATTR(engine_regs, 0444, show_engine_regs, NULL);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(engine_regs, 0444, engine_regs_show, NULL);
Shouldn't this just be using a DEVICE_ATTR_RO() macro instead? Make
that change and the name will be fixed up at the same time.
And did checkpatch really complain about this? What was the actual
message it produced?
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
