On 18/10/2020 20:48, Deepak R Varma wrote:
Boolean comparison of the condition inside unittest function is
unnecessary and can be simplified by directly using the condition
outcome for evaluation. Issue reported by :
scripts/coccinelle/misc/boolinit.cocci
Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/tests/ni_routes_test.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/tests/ni_routes_test.c b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/tests/ni_routes_test.c
index eaefaf596a37..7db83cf5e4aa 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/tests/ni_routes_test.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/tests/ni_routes_test.c
@@ -499,13 +499,13 @@ void test_route_register_is_valid(void)
const struct ni_route_tables *T = &private.routing_tables;
init_pci_fake();
- unittest(route_register_is_valid(4, O(4), T) == false,
+ unittest(!route_register_is_valid(4, O(4), T),
"check for bad source 4-->4\n");
- unittest(route_register_is_valid(0, O(1), T) == true,
+ unittest(!route_register_is_valid(0, O(1), T),
"find first source\n");
- unittest(route_register_is_valid(4, O(6), T) == true,
+ unittest(!route_register_is_valid(4, O(6), T),
"find middle source\n");
- unittest(route_register_is_valid(9, O(8), T) == true,
+ unittest(!route_register_is_valid(9, O(8), T),
"find last source");
}
NAK.
It looks like you have inadvertently inverted some of the tests.
--
-=( Ian Abbott <abbotti@xxxxxxxxx> || MEV Ltd. is a company )=-
-=( registered in England & Wales. Regd. number: 02862268. )=-
-=( Regd. addr.: S11 & 12 Building 67, Europa Business Park, )=-
-=( Bird Hall Lane, STOCKPORT, SK3 0XA, UK. || www.mev.co.uk )=-
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
