On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 11:45 PM Aditya Jain <aditya.jainadityajain.jain@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 10:45 PM Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2020-07-26 at 17:02 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 07:50:12PM +0530, Aditya Jain wrote: > > > > Cleaning up messy multiline function declarations in hal_phy_cfg.h > > [] > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/hal_phy_cfg.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/hal_phy_cfg.h > > [] > Ok, I'll merge this patch with the previous one. Had separated the two > to make the diffs smaller thinking they'll > be easier to review. But yeah, I get the point. > > > > -void > > > > -PHY_SetSwChnlBWMode8723B( > > > > -struct adapter *Adapter, > > > > -u8 channel, > > > > -enum CHANNEL_WIDTH Bandwidth, > > > > -u8 Offset40, > > > > -u8 Offset80 > > > > +void PHY_SetBWMode8723B(struct adapter *Adapter, > > > > + enum CHANNEL_WIDTH Bandwidth, /* 20M or 40M */ > > > > + unsigned char Offset /* Upper, Lower, or Don't care */ > > > > > > Those comments should go at the top of the function declaration, in > > > kernel doc format. > > > > Not every external function needs kernel-doc. > > > > This is a realtek staging driver that likely it will never be > > moved out of staging. > > > > > Should I just remove the comments then? Sorry, but I'm a newbie, and > not really sure what the function is or supposed to do. > I can try looking it up if kernel-doc is required here. Hi all, Any directions on how I should continue? > > Regards, > Aditya Jain Thanks and Regards, Aditya Jain _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
