On 25/07/20 2:12 am, Marc Dietrich wrote:
>
> Hi Rohit,
>
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2020, Rohit K Bharadwaj wrote:
>
>> On 24/07/20 10:06 pm, Marc Dietrich wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 24 Jul 2020, Marc Dietrich wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Rohit,
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 24 Jul 2020, Rohit Bharadwaj wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 24/07/20 1:58 pm, Greg KH wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 01:44:27PM +0530, Rohit Bharadwaj wrote:
>>>>>>> On 24/07/20 10:06 am, Rohit K Bharadwaj wrote:
>>>>>>>> changed usage of slave (deprecated) to secondary
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Rohit K Bharadwaj <bharadwaj.rohit8@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> v3: change patch subject, add version history
>>>>>>>> v2: add changelog text in body of mail
>>>>>>>> v1: fix style issues by changing usage of slave to secondary
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c | 12 ++++++------
>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
>>>>>>>> index 360ec0407740..5d7b66719a39 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *dev)
>>>>>>>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -static void tegra_init_i2c_slave(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
>>>>>>>> +static void tegra_init_i2c_secondary(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> u32 val;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @@ -744,7 +744,7 @@ static void tegra_init_i2c_slave(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>>>>>>> -static void nvec_disable_i2c_slave(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
>>>>>>>> +static void nvec_disable_i2c_secondary(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> disable_irq(nvec->irq);
>>>>>>>> writel(I2C_SL_NEWSL | I2C_SL_NACK, nvec->base + I2C_SL_CNFG);
>>>>>>>> @@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ static int tegra_nvec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>>>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, nvec);
>>>>>>>> nvec->dev = dev;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "slave-addr", &nvec->i2c_addr)) {
>>>>>>>> + if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "secondary-addr", &nvec->i2c_addr)) {
>>>>>>>> dev_err(dev, "no i2c address specified");
>>>>>>>> return -ENODEV;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> as Christoph said, please don't change this line.
>>>
>>> arr, I meant Dan of course ;-)
>> Dear all, thank you so much for your inputs, I will try to make some other patch which will not break the driver (hopefully :p), or if you give me permission to submit this patch itself by just keeping this one line
>>
>>> if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "slave-addr", &nvec->i2c_addr))
>>
>> unchanged, and provided it does not break the driver by doing so, I would gladly make the changes and submit v4 of the patch.
>
> please resend the patch with the line above unchanged as v4. Don't forget to to update the changelog to the commit message. I tested your patch (without the dt property change) and it does not change behavoir - as expected,
> so you will recevice my Ack.
>
> Marc
Thank you so much for the suggestions and the Ack sir, I have made the necessary changes and I have sent the v4 of the patch.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
